♥2E1 '06 ♥adel ♥aloysius ♥ain[obbd] ♥ariel[obbd] ♥alex ♥berlyn ♥benjamin ♥ching yong ♥chin rong ♥chang jun ♥crystal ♥clement[obbd] ♥dennis ♥felicia[teens] ♥ghup ♥hanafi ♥guang yi ♥hidayah ♥hawa ♥hui qin [teens] ♥ivan[teens] ♥jefrence ♥jarratt ♥jacinda[teens] ♥jolene ♥lidya ♥lynette yuen[teens] ♥lynette ong ♥manfred[teens] ♥matthew aka mogwai ♥marianne ♥nancy ♥nicholas ♥nurul ♥priscilla han ♥qiu ling ♥rui ting ♥rachael teo ♥sharon[teens] ♥teck yi ♥wei yang ♥wei guang[obbd] ♥wen jie ♥wei jie[obbd] ♥xiao zheng ♥yin xian ♥zoe credits
This blogskin is proudly presented to you by Anna May.
Sunday, December 27, 2009 @ 1:39 AM "Bro Lee will be giving a 10 min opening on evangelist Christians who say it's better to be safe and accept God/Jesus rather than taking the risk of going to hell. After the introduction, we will break up into groups of 10-12 for 20mins to facilitate group discussion. At the end of the group discussion, a representative from each group will present their group's findings. Bro Lee will then sum up and present his talk." seriously. why do these people find it so entertaining to diss other people's faith. Isn't the outcome of this discussion is so obvious, when all the people in the discussion groups are buddhists? it's like humans gathering around, questioning themselves if they're homo sapiens.. like no offense, but it kind of means to me that they wouldn't mind risking going to hell together. or maybe "let us test God that when we die we won't go to hell, afterall, who is he to tell me what to do, let alone send me to hell". Dude, we are but mere humans. Who are we to test God's will? even in church we don't entertain ourselves and make ourselves feel better about being a christian and make people who come from other faith feel lousy, by holding a "Buddhism cannot lead you on the path towards heaven" discussion. and the overall objective is to make christians feel awesome and people from other faiths feel like crap. Like, if they really think that Buddhism is the way, i respect that, but why must they hold these lame discussions, if they feel so strongly about it? Why must they go to such lengths to "prove" to people other religions is bogus if they are really confident about their faith.. Like in the bible, a verse says that if the town of village does not believe, shake the dust off your feet and move on (If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.Matthew 10:13-15), because if they don't believe even after you tried telling them the truth it's okay (And if any place will not welcome you or listen to you, shake the dust off your feet when you leave, as a testimony against them."Mark 6:10-12). It didn't say: if people don't believe, hold discussions to diss their religion, and prove that our religion is the true religion. Moral of the story, Respect other people's religion, if they don't believe it's no biggie, just move on.. don't hold these weird discussions when the outcome is like obvious. buddhists discuss whether christianity is valid. of course the result will be: christianity is invalid. Right? *roll eyes* Do a better survey man, like at least add more people from other religions to at least make it more legit and reliable... Don't they ever learn project work?? ATTN: "they" meaning that particular group of buddhists who organised the discussion.. fuming at this weird discussion weirdos.. |